Since the '70s, the United States Congress have challenged on a draft legislation on asbestos. This is the result of a discussion that took place earlier in the context of so-called "Black Lung Bill", which is known to be the first mention of asbestos in a regulatory context.
The material consists of a group of asbestos fibers that can be dangerous to humans if inhaled or ingested. exposure to asbestos causes serious diseases such as asbestosis and lung cancer and mesothelioma, fatal, which claims thousands of lives each year. In particular, workers exposed to asbestos ex-prisoners of jobs in manufacturing, building and construction are of a high risk of developing health above. But it is also a significant number of people are exposed to material of habitat due to asbestos products are abundant and widely used throughout the country, especially for purposes of isolation.
But it's not just the U.S. Congress, which plays a major role in creating the asbestos legislation pending. Occupational Health Service Administration, Consumer Product Safety Commission and the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) is one of several interest groups weighing in with their ideas and arguments.
Over the past 10 years, developed asbestos-law submitted to Congress almost every year. Meanwhile, the arguments and discussions between representatives of the rights of asbestos victims' groups and the protection of commercial interests will continue to exist. On the other hand, we have justified on the grounds that there is an undeniable health risk to all those who have been exposed to asbestos. Another concern that we see companies and insurers, who often feel exploited. Given that, were forced to pay compensation to people who are not really sick, but still the award-winning solution, because of the potential risk of developing asbestos-related disease at some point in the future.
In 1999, the "beauty of Asbestos Compensation Act" was proposed. The proposal included the installation of a government body responsible for the only solution to resolve asbestos cases, even before coming to court. This would help to unlock the courts and help them deal with only those cases where the claim requires the decision of the judge and jury. Some similar bills were introduced later, some even passed the U.S. Senate, but has not received enough votes to become law.
"Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act was proposed in 2004, which aims to create a fund in excess of about 125 billion dollars allocated for compensation of asbestos victims. It 'was a vote at the end.
Abstract: The battle continues. Companies and insurance companies want immunity and protection against illegitimate claims, while asbestos victims and their legal representatives continue to urge the government to find a solution. asbestos litigation is always an issue and no decision has yet been taken.
The material consists of a group of asbestos fibers that can be dangerous to humans if inhaled or ingested. exposure to asbestos causes serious diseases such as asbestosis and lung cancer and mesothelioma, fatal, which claims thousands of lives each year. In particular, workers exposed to asbestos ex-prisoners of jobs in manufacturing, building and construction are of a high risk of developing health above. But it is also a significant number of people are exposed to material of habitat due to asbestos products are abundant and widely used throughout the country, especially for purposes of isolation.
But it's not just the U.S. Congress, which plays a major role in creating the asbestos legislation pending. Occupational Health Service Administration, Consumer Product Safety Commission and the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) is one of several interest groups weighing in with their ideas and arguments.
Over the past 10 years, developed asbestos-law submitted to Congress almost every year. Meanwhile, the arguments and discussions between representatives of the rights of asbestos victims' groups and the protection of commercial interests will continue to exist. On the other hand, we have justified on the grounds that there is an undeniable health risk to all those who have been exposed to asbestos. Another concern that we see companies and insurers, who often feel exploited. Given that, were forced to pay compensation to people who are not really sick, but still the award-winning solution, because of the potential risk of developing asbestos-related disease at some point in the future.
In 1999, the "beauty of Asbestos Compensation Act" was proposed. The proposal included the installation of a government body responsible for the only solution to resolve asbestos cases, even before coming to court. This would help to unlock the courts and help them deal with only those cases where the claim requires the decision of the judge and jury. Some similar bills were introduced later, some even passed the U.S. Senate, but has not received enough votes to become law.
"Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act was proposed in 2004, which aims to create a fund in excess of about 125 billion dollars allocated for compensation of asbestos victims. It 'was a vote at the end.
Abstract: The battle continues. Companies and insurance companies want immunity and protection against illegitimate claims, while asbestos victims and their legal representatives continue to urge the government to find a solution. asbestos litigation is always an issue and no decision has yet been taken.
No comments:
Post a Comment