By: Lena Butler
The argument that drug testing actually causes more harm to society rather than using that knowledge has become popular in recent years. Although drug testing was designed and implemented to reduce the harm caused to society by drugs, the reality of the impact of drug testing seems to be completely different.
Drug testing in schools has increased, the military and work at a fast pace. The raison d'être is to promote a healthy environment free of drugs and promoting zero tolerance policy on drug abuse. But the campaign together drug testing actually reduce the rate of drug use, or is it really complicated the issue by running the culprit in the wall.
When a person has been inspected and found guilty of drug use, not always assist in the rehabilitation and recycling, we tend to believe. Those who are abusing drugs may have in custody, they may lose their job or even lose custody of her children. The concern is that the person observed drug testing can be carried out the sentence, which really reduces its relations with society and reduce the chances of a return to normal life.
It is not just the work that is in the shadow of drug testing. Drug testing in schools Former fell in the gray area of the law and has been avoided for some time. But the U.S. Supreme Court approved the drug testing of students in public schools who participate in recreational activities such as sport, and it is generally accepted that this will be expanded to include all students in the future. A student who is tested and found to have used drugs can be expelled for that reason alone. Instead of the reintegration of addicts into ordinary social life, what a drug test which succeed to do is really to deny students a decent education to push further into addiction.
Another perspective of this whole thing is the perception that this is not really the treatment after a positive doping test that prevent the person against other abuses, it is rather the threat of incarceration and punishment. When drug testing has identified a drug addict, the treatment, the release of the dependency is considered unnecessary by a lobby which argues that it is the possibility of pain and loss of jobs that really motivates people to Security actually stop abusing drugs. This perspective emphasizes that drug testing, punishment or threat of it is timely and constructive way to cleanse the society of addicts.
Note the urine drug test does not distinguish between a normal regular drug user and experimenter once. When the results of drug testing as a positive return, which contains no information on when the person uses the drug, which does not contain information on how to use often.
What are the results of this is that these two types of drug users are clumped and of those who experienced a recreational drug users only once in their lives are marked as addicts, too.
This article was written by Lena Butler, the author of Drug Testing FAQ country, a longer version of this article is drug testing issues and resources for home health and other items of evidence are being used, for example Test Country Drug Test Kit
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Lena_Butler
Drug testing in schools has increased, the military and work at a fast pace. The raison d'être is to promote a healthy environment free of drugs and promoting zero tolerance policy on drug abuse. But the campaign together drug testing actually reduce the rate of drug use, or is it really complicated the issue by running the culprit in the wall.
When a person has been inspected and found guilty of drug use, not always assist in the rehabilitation and recycling, we tend to believe. Those who are abusing drugs may have in custody, they may lose their job or even lose custody of her children. The concern is that the person observed drug testing can be carried out the sentence, which really reduces its relations with society and reduce the chances of a return to normal life.
It is not just the work that is in the shadow of drug testing. Drug testing in schools Former fell in the gray area of the law and has been avoided for some time. But the U.S. Supreme Court approved the drug testing of students in public schools who participate in recreational activities such as sport, and it is generally accepted that this will be expanded to include all students in the future. A student who is tested and found to have used drugs can be expelled for that reason alone. Instead of the reintegration of addicts into ordinary social life, what a drug test which succeed to do is really to deny students a decent education to push further into addiction.
Another perspective of this whole thing is the perception that this is not really the treatment after a positive doping test that prevent the person against other abuses, it is rather the threat of incarceration and punishment. When drug testing has identified a drug addict, the treatment, the release of the dependency is considered unnecessary by a lobby which argues that it is the possibility of pain and loss of jobs that really motivates people to Security actually stop abusing drugs. This perspective emphasizes that drug testing, punishment or threat of it is timely and constructive way to cleanse the society of addicts.
Note the urine drug test does not distinguish between a normal regular drug user and experimenter once. When the results of drug testing as a positive return, which contains no information on when the person uses the drug, which does not contain information on how to use often.
What are the results of this is that these two types of drug users are clumped and of those who experienced a recreational drug users only once in their lives are marked as addicts, too.
This article was written by Lena Butler, the author of Drug Testing FAQ country, a longer version of this article is drug testing issues and resources for home health and other items of evidence are being used, for example Test Country Drug Test Kit
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Lena_Butler
No comments:
Post a Comment